Search:  Search
    Home Subscriptions Current issue Back issues About TAE Internships Advertising Write us    
Home > Back issues > Education Fairy Tales > Print This E-mail This
July/August 2006 cover 120
Subscribe

 
Reaganomics & the poor
By Ralph R. Reiland

Previous Columns

06/14 - Kerry and Barry in 2004
06/11 - It wasn't an act
06/10 - Dreaming in English
06/09 - A proposal to end outsourcing

Click here to access the archives.

Ask a good liberal about Reaganomics and he'll say three things: Reagan tried to make ketchup a vegetable, he flooded the country in red ink, and he was mean-spirited about the poor, like when he'd tell the story about the Cadillac-ensconced "Chicago welfare queen" who had 80 names, 30 addresses, and 12 Social Security cards.

 

In fact, the real income (adjusted for inflation) of the poorest fifth of U.S. households increased by 12 percent in the 1980s, reversing a 17 percent slide between 1979 and 1983, before the economic growth of the Reagan era kicked in. The poverty population, after growing by 7 million during the late 1970s, dropped by 4 million in the 1980s.

 

One only has to recall the kind of economy Reagan inherited to see that things for the poor weren't exactly all hunky-dory during the time the allegedly less mean-spirited Jimmy Carter was in charge.

 

Inflation in 1980 was 13.5 percent, a jump in the cost of living that's least affordable for those at the bottom, who are least likely to be able to get wage increases to match runway price increases. By 1986, Reaganomics had knocked the inflation rate down to 1.9 percent--especially good news for those who don't have the luxury of dealing with big price hikes by simply cutting back a bit on yacht and diamond expenditures. 

 

For the years 1977-81, taken as a whole, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that wages, on average, increased by 35 percent while prices jumped by 49.4 percent, producing an overall drop in excess of 14 percent in the real value of American paychecks.

 

With jobs, Reagan inherited a collapsing economy with unemployment rates rising from 7 percent in 1980 to 8 and 10 percent in 1981 and 1982, respectively. By 1989, Reaganomics had cut the U.S. jobless rate in half to 5 percent--especially good news, again, for those at the bottom, who found themselves standing in ever-lengthening unemployment lines prior to the Gipper's arrival.

 

Altogether, 19 million U.S. jobs were created from 1982 to 1989, more than the total number of jobs created in Europe and Japan combined, two-thirds of them high- or middle-paying jobs, which produced real income increases in every income group, from the poorest fifth of households to the richest fifth. By 1988, more than three-quarters of the tax filers in the poorest fifth of families in 1980 had moved out of that bottom quintile, with some 16 percent moving all the way to the top fifth of income earners.

 

Among African-American households in the 1980s, the number of families earning more than $50,000 in real dollars doubled from 7 to 14 percent, the unemployment rate for black teenagers fell by 21 percent, black employment in professional and managerial occupations expanded by one-third, and the number of black-owned businesses increased by 38 percent, triple the rate of overall business growth during that period. Overall, the real median income of African-American households increased by 17 percent between 1982 and 1989, reversing the 10 percent decline from 1978 to 1982.

 

It doesn't much matter, in short, whether ketchup is a vegetable or if Reagan embellished a bit about how many names the Cadillac lady had in Chicago (the "welfare queen" in question was actually convicted for using two different aliases). What worked was a program of tax cuts, incentives, and deregulation that unleashed one of the strongest and longest economic expansions in U.S. history--an expansion that cut unemployment, increased business investment, raised productivity, reduced poverty and reversed the overall decline in the purchasing power of American paychecks.

 

And the red ink? Think of how deep it might have been if Reaganomics hadn't reversed the nation's economic decline, if the unemployment rate had continued on its way up to 15 or 20 percent, reducing income tax revenues at the same time government outflows expanded to accommodate the newly unemployed and poor. Consider, too, how the Soviets were on the march in Angola, Afghanistan, Nicaragua, and Somalia when Reagan was inaugurated, and how they were well on their way to what Reagan called the "ash heap of history" by the time he had left. Think of how much red ink might be flowing now if the Soviets controlled half the globe.

 

Ralph R. Reiland is the B. Kenneth Simon Professor of Free Enterprise at Robert Morris University and a columnist at the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. E-mail him at: rrreiland@aol.com.




Other TAE Daily columns
08/11/06 - Filing for Divorce
08/11/06 - The Greatness of World Trade Center
08/10/06 - AOL is Watching You
08/09/06 - Immoderately Moderate or Moderately Immoderate
08/08/06 - The Heart of the Party
Click here to access the Archives